Sunday, November 23, 2008

Six videos of extreme importance to the 911 Truth effort



David Ray Griffin.University of Wisconsin..American Empire..ie, Fascism



Part Two David Ray Griffin..University of Wisconsin.American Empire

David Ray Griffin..University of Wisconsin..American Empire

William Barett Univ. of Wisconsin



Steven Jones, molton metal



Exposives, firemen,



inside the buildiing, get a close and intimate look during the chaos and destruction



bomb, no sceond plane, and other revelations

Thursday, November 13, 2008

David Ray Griffin's latest book, "The New Pearl Harbor Revisited", is out, with Chapter 2 section highlighting my findings (Barbara Honegger) on the Pentagon bombs, (the FBI's code name for the entire 9/11 investigation is PENTTBOMB), a true breakthrough, as the definitive work by the world leader in 911 research, now makes clear that the real story of 9/11 is inside bombs at both the WTC and the Pentagon, with plane impacts the mere pre-scripted cover story necessitating the real inside-perpetrators' being in total control of the planes on the approach to their targets, proving the 'hijackers' could not have been in control of the aircraft -- if they were in the planes at all (Griffin: "There is no evidence any of the 'hijackers' ever got on any of the planes.")

Another very important new 9/11 expose book, "The 9/11 Mystery Plane" by Mark Gaffney, just came out, with a foreward by David Ray Griffin. It's a must read for anyone serious about 9/11 Truth, and covers much more than the white E-4B command and control 'doomsday plane' that circled over the White House just before and as the Pentagon was attacked (from the inside first) on 9/11. Clearly and simply written for 'the average person' and pulls no punches.

David Ray Griffin's historic Japan trip, during which he gave four public addresses to overflow audiences and met with top members of the country's Parliament.

The creation of two new 9/11 truth professional organizations, Lawyers for 9/11 Truth, just officially formed, and one that will be called something like
Legislators/Politicians for 9/11 Truth
that is being formed by invitation only to start, to ensure highly respected elected officials (current and former) from friendly countries are in the first roster. David met with the Japanese parliamentarian
who's already raised 9/11 Truth on the floor of their congress (Fujita (check spelling) and other members of the equivalent of their Senate about forming this new organization while there. Honegger's 'Pentagon Attack Papers' is being used in part as the reference for a coming legal action initiated by one of the founding members of Lawyers for 9/11 Truth, especially my interviews with then NORAD head Gen. Ralph Eberhardt, then Acting Asst. Sec. of Defense for Special Operations Robert Andrew, and then Pentagon Army employee April Gallop. This is very promising, and ongoing right now.

The New York City 9/11 Citizens Ballot Initiative obtained the 30,000 certified petition signatures of registered NYC voters needed to ensure an initiative calling for a new independent 9/11 investigation be placed on the ballot there. There wasn't
enough time by the Sept. 4 deadline for the initiative to go through the City Council process and make it on this Nov. ballot, but it is now guaranteed to be on the ballot in the next election held in NYC.
A federal judge ordered the Bush Admin. to release the 'original authorization' the White House claims Bush signed on Oct. 23, 2001 allegedly authorizing the 'first' illegal warrantless domestic wiretaps, which the administration has refused to turn over to Congress for the almost three years since its revelation in the press. Related,
next month, in Dec., a federal judge in S.F. will hold a pre-trial hearing on whether the retroactive immunity purportedly granted to telecoms by the FISA Amendments Act is constitutional (it's clearly not, per Art. I, Sec. 9 of the Constitution which states
that Congress shall pass no ex post facto (retroactive) law). I'm working with Danny Sheehan to input to that case, as the court rulings in his successful Karen Silkwood case is directly relevant to the Plaintiff's (the S.F. Electronic Freedom Foundation's) arguments.

Honegger's article on the anthrax links to 9/11 is published in the Oct. issue of the independent D.C. paper The Rock Creek Free Press, which reaches over 50,000 readers in the nation's capital and is distributed at all 24 metro stops, including the Pentagon metro stop.

This links to the above item, as the 'bottom line' of Creek article is that the anthrax attacks, like 9/11, were an inside job, which the Administration has officially acknowledged, and the 'original authorization' Bush claims he signed authorizing
these illegal warrantless domestic/U.S. wiretaps was signed on Oct. 23, 2001, right in the middle of the anthrax scare, and thus almost certainly used their own inside job anthrax attacks to justify the massive illegal spy program.

We voted at the November meetiing. to inquire with the editor of The Rock Creek Free Press regularly obtaining a large number of copies of the paper for distribution here on the Monterey Peninsula. The group voted -- and donated to -- obtaining 500 copies of a great new four-page, full-color newspaper-format summary of the key evidence that the official 9/11 story is a lie, for distribution and fundraising at speaking events here on the Monterey Peninsula.

Highlight from the next day, Nov. 4: OBAMA WINS. This is critical, as one of his first initiatives is likely to be to undo20Bush's undoing of Clinton's signing of the first
step in the legal process of putting the U.S. under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC), a key jurisdiction for future cases seeking legal accountability for the true inside 9/11 perpetrators.

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Ruining Rove’s ‘bin Laden’ October Surprise

Barbara Honegger

Barbara Honewgger is the author of "The October Surprise", the first book to expose the true origins of the Iran side of the Iran/Contra scandal; the President of 9/11 Truth Monterey; a senior military affairs journalist; and former White House Policy Analyst and Special Assistant to the Assistant to the President in the first Reagan Administration.

While Al Qaeda leaders appear to have posted on the Internet that they are considering a terrorist strike before the presidential election to favor John McCain (“On Al Qaeda Web Sites, Joy Over Crisis, Support for McCain,” Washington Post, Oct. 22, 2008), far more likely is an attempt by the Republicans to try to pull a ‘bin Laden’ October Surprise before Nov. 4.

Indeed, with McCain crashing and burning in the polls and unable to contain his wild-eyed Mr. Hyde from bursting into full view on national television in the final presidential debate, all Bush, Rove and McCain have left is an ‘October Surprise’ – a high risk dirty trick before the election, usually in mid to late October, that can only ‘work’ if the Republicans’ fingerprints aren’t seen to be on it. But because McCain, despite his ‘I’m not President Bush’, is the candidate of the morally and financially bankrupt Republican party and voted with Bush 90 percent of the time, the only ‘October Surprise’ that could have even a hope of being effective would be one that appeared to rehabilitate Bush.

The most obvious such ‘rehabilitation’ would be one that appeared to vindicate Bush’s ‘war on terror’ by ‘finding’ ‘bin Laden’ before the election. Despite the fact that bin Laden has never been wanted for the Sept. 11 attacks by the FBI on its ‘Most Wanted Terrorists’ web page, and Director Mueller and the FBI’s chief investigative spokesman have publicly stated that the reason for this is that there is ‘no hard evidence’ linking him to the 9/11 plot (1), ‘finding’ bin Laden and charging him for 9/11 before Nov. 4 would, the Republicans are sure to believe, be to the benefit of McCain.

There’s only one problem. The real bin Laden is almost surely dead. Even before 9/11, he suffered from a serious disease that required frequent dialysis, which is impossible to obtain in a cave or in the wild mountains of the Afghan-Pakistan border. But being dead wouldn’t stop Bush, Rove and McCain from resurrecting bin Laden’s ghost for an ‘October Surprise,’ especially when they’re desperate.

So if they do, who will ‘bin Laden’ really be? Where are they going to ‘find’ a 6-foot, 4-inch Muslim who looks like bin Laden and whom they know they can control?

Funny thing, it turns out they already have him: Richard Reid, the infamous ‘Shoe Bomber,’ who’s in solitary confinement at the maximum security prison in Florence , Colorado . The New York Times, in separate articles, reported that both bin Laden and Reid happen to be 6’4” in height. And a forensic digital portrait photographer has noted the striking similarity between their images, as proven by the photos accompanying this article.

The first is the most famous public image of bin Laden,


and the second the most well known public imAge of Richard Reid.


The third is the No. 1 image of bin Laden with a 50% transparency overlay of the No. 2 photo of Reid
and, to show it both ways,

the fourth is the No. 2 photo of Reid with a 50% transparency overlay of the No. 1 photo of bin Laden.


The photo journalist who did these overlays stated that when he first saw them, it sent chills up and down his spine: “Reid could easily be – and probably has been – used as a stand-in double for bin Laden,” he said.

By the way, Reid was ‘captured’ – came in out of the cold – on an airplane trying to light his shoes in a tight space next to other passengers (he might as well have had an ‘Arrest Me!’ banner plastered across his chest) the same week, in Dec. 2001, that ‘bin Laden’ ‘escaped’ from Tora Bora.

Bottom line: If Bush, Rove and McCain pull ‘bin Laden’ out of a rabbit hole between now and the election, demand to see ‘bin Laden’ in the same room at the same time as ‘Shoe Bomber’ Richard Reid.

1 http://www.twf.org/News/Y2006/0608-BinLaden.html

Saturday, September 13, 2008

Richard Gage rebuttal to NIST report on WTC7

Below is an article on Richard Gage's rebuttal to the just-released
NIST report on WTC7. Also go to his Architects and Engineers web page, www.ae911truth.org, if you haven't done so already, for more details --
especially re his press conference reacting to the report.

By the way, per the first paragraph in the below,if it was really a "new" phenomenon, then it was a weapon that caused the 'new'thermal expansion.'

There are no 'new phenomena.'

As Federal Agency Declares 'New Phenomenon' Downed WTC 7, Activists Cry Foul

Raw Story
Aug. 21, 2008

http://rawstory.com/news/20/BREAKING_NIST_%3CI%3Efinally%3CI%3E_poses_theory_on_0821.html


According to a federal agency report released Thursday, a "new phenomenon" known as thermal expansion was directly responsible for the mysterious collapse of World Trade Center 7 on Sept. 11, 2001.

This study, posted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology -- a federal scientific agency which promotes technical industrial standards -- marks the first 'official' government theory on the collapse.

The building's demise occurred some seven hours after the twin towers collapsed on Sept. 11, 2 001, and has been the source of numerous conspiracy theories key to the "9/11 Truth" movement, most of which argue that the symmetrical, seven-second collapse was brought about by a controlled demolition.

Dr. Shyam Sunder, director of Institute's building and fire research laboratory, oversaw the government's three-year research efforts. The report aims to disprove the controlled demolition argument.

However, Richard Gage, founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth anda member of the American Institute of Architects, doesn't believe a word of the theory.

His group, which has swelled to over 400 architectural and engineering professionals, immediately responded to the Institute's claim in a press conference.

"Tons of [molten metal] was found 21 days after the attack," said Gage in an interview with a Vancouver, Canada television station. "Steel doesn't begin to melt until 2,700 degrees, which is much hotter than what these fires could have caused."

"There are holes in this story that you can drive a truck through," Gage added during the press conference. His group asserts that thermite, a steel cutting agent, was used to bring the building down.

Dr. Sunder disagreed.

"We conducted the study without bias, without interference from anyone," said Dr. Sunder. "We have only one single-minded goal in this effort."

Wh ile the Institute said it considered the possibility of a controlled demolition taking place at WTC 7, the notion was dismissed due to the absence of any recordings of an explosion sound.

Thermite,20however, does not make an explosion sound. And while this was raised to Dr. Sunder in the media's Q&A session, he dismissed it as impossible.

"FEMA found it," said Gage. "Dr. Steven Jones found it, in the dust that landed in the entire area of lower Manhattan. And he finds it in the chunks of previously molten metal [from the towers]."

Specifically, in Appendix C of its World Trade Center Building Performance Study, FEMA claimed:
Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intergranular melting, was readily visible in the near-surface microstructure. A liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel... The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified.
Yet, no study of the mysterious sulfur or melted steel was included in the NIST report.

After New York City officials cut off the water main to the tower Sept. 11, 2001, the building's sprinkler system was unable to function, Dr. Sunder said. This allowed & nbsp; fires across 10 floors to burn uncontrolled for nearly seven hours.

The Institute asserts that due to the lack of water supply, an “extraordinary event” occurred, and for20the first time ever, steel expanding due to heat from the flames caused columns to separate from structural concrete. Column 79 was the first to fail, according to the report, which brought about a quick succession of failures in adjoining columns.

"Thermal expansion of long-span floor systems" was a critical element in the collapse, said Dr. Sunder. The "kink" seen in the building's penthouse portion in video of the collapse was in-line with the columns which failed first.

"If water had been available, it is likely that sprinklers would have operated and the building may still be here today," he said.

"It looks like they want to wrap-up this investigation and blame [the collapse] on normal office fires," said Gage during counter-conference.

WTC 7's structural system is in "widespread use" in other buildings, he added, insisting that such effects may also be present elsewhere. The Institute's report also includes recommendations for the strengthening of building codes to avoid future thermal expansion-driven collapses.

The collapse of WTC 7 is "no longer a mystery," Dr. Sunder claimed.

The Institute's full report is available at wtc.nist.gov.

Further details from the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth press conference are forthcoming.