Friday, May 15, 2009

Three 9-11 Truth Experts in Monterey,

Hey! Where is the plane? Did somebody drag it away? Looks like nary a plane that Septembeer day. Looks like a big bomb went BOOOOOOOOOOOM. How come it is said that a plane hit the Pentagon? Rumor? Bad Press? No other explanation as to how?



How about a missle like this 911 Commision represenitive Tim Roener "accidentally" admitted..or.. "Bombs planted inside the buiding"? But who would do a thing like that? Terrorists? But how did they get inside the building and plant bombs? Maybe they worked for the "security" that "protects" the building? Oh MY God! Let's find out.
Stay tuned and scroll down inside here for clues and facts.



911truthseattle.org meets Norm Mineta



911 Commission - Trans. Sec Norman Mineta Testimony




Mineta and the secret orders of Cheney


Urgent Message from Richard Gage, AIA

NYC 9/11 Investigation Ballot Initiative
Fellow Architect/Engineer and other Petition Signers,
It looks like 2009 will be the breakthrough year for establishing a real investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center high-rise on 9/11. At the San Francisco AIA convention, April 30=2 0to May 2, about 60 architects signed our petition calling for a new investigation, bringing the total number of architects and engineers calling for a new investigation to over 700.
Out on the East coast, a different petition is happening—one that we must support FULLY. In the very city where these tragic events took place, over 38,000 New Yorkers have so far signed the petition calling for a citywide referendum on the formation of a new, independent, impartial investigation into the events of September 11, 2001. When the voters of New York City collect the required number of signatures to put this referendum on the ballot and pass it by majority vote, a new Commission will be formed, this time consisting of pre-selected individuals who will follow the evidence wherever it may lead. Such a Commission will give us the legally established venue to present the evidence for the explosive controlled demolition of the three WTC high-rises.
For over three years, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth have called upon Congress to reopen the 9/11 investigation. Our demand has fallen on deaf ears. Now, we have the opportunity to help make this investigation a reality.
The dedic ated team at NYCCAN in New York City need OUR support. To guarantee their referendum will make it on the ballot, they must to collect 35,000 more signatures by the end of June. Their goal is attainable if they have adequate funding. Their petitioning staff has become so effective that they collect 1 signature for every dollar spent – “a buck a sig”, as they like to put it. If 2,000 of us donate only $25, they will immediately raise the $50,000 needed for the completion of their petitioning effort. And with 75,000 signatures, the referendum will indeed make it on the ballot. This donation must be in addition to your ongoing support of AE911Truth. We cannot afford to lose any of your valued support at this time – as our upcoming architect convention projects are equally important in the overall 9/11 truth effort.
Now is the time for us to put our money where our heart is. Donate $25 right now, and we will be able to present the evidence before an independent, impartial Commission. Now is the time to support the New York City Coalition for Accountability Now, because NYC CAN.
www.NYCCAN.org
One real chance. One real investigation. Donate now.

Sincerely,

Richard Gage, AIA


Pentagon Attack Papers Honnegger










Pentagon attack where;s the palne?



Have You Forgotten...Ace Baker

Monday, April 6, 2009

David Ray Griffin AND April Gallup interviews

SCROLL PAST THE APRIL GALLUP INTERVIEW FOR DAVID RAY GRIFFINS VIDEOS AND BIBLIOGRAPHY..


9/11: Time for a Second Look SEE BELOW FOR APRIL GALLUP INTERVIEW..SHE WAS INSIDE THE PEATAGON ON 911 AND SAID "NO AIRPLANES HIT THE PENTAGON"..AN INTERNAL EXPLOSION CAUSED THE DAMAGE.



VERY IMPORTANT1 APRIL GALLUP WAS IINSIDE TYHE PENTAGON ON 911.."THERE WAS NO AIRPLANE!

April Gallup 911 Pentagon Survivor on alex Jones TV : No Plane Part One



April Gallup Was there a bomb in the Pentagon #2



alexJones April Gallup #3



Aprol Gallup #4

“9/11 Conspiracy Guru” David Ray Griffin
to speak at Boston University -- April 11, 2009



No single proponent of alternative theories concerning the events of September 11, 2001 has received more attention – supportive and critical – than Professor David Ray Griffin, who will be giving a public lecture at Boston University’s Morse Auditorium on Saturday, April 11, 2009 at 7pm. Dr. Griffin’s appearance at Boston University will be his first ever in Boston, after which he will embark on his second European tour, where he will present the most thorough, up-to-date and popularly accepted alternative critique of the 9/11 story to audiences in London, Brussels, Paris, Madrid, Lausanne, Lucerne, Hamburg, Stockholm, Trondheim, and Oslo. The BU event is co-sponsored by the Boston University School of Theology and the Boston 9/11 Truth Committee.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vb_MzN5DWQc

Howard Zinn, Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Boston University:
“David Ray Griffin's provocative questions about 9/11 deserve to be investigated and addressed.”


David Ray Griffin is Professor of Philosophy of Religion and Theology, Emeritus, at Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Graduate University in Claremont, California, where he remains a co-director of the Center for Process Studies.
He has published (as author or editor) 34 books, primarily in theology, philosophy, and philosophy of religion, with special emphases on the problem of evil and the relation between science and religion.

Seven of his books deal with 9/11: The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11 (2004), The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions (2005), Christian Faith and the Truth about 9/11: A Call to Reflection and Action (2006), 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out (2006, co-edited with Peter Dale Scott), Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory (2007), 9/11 Contradictions: An Open Letter to Congress and the Press, and his latest, The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-U and the Exposé (2008). In 2008 Griffin also made presentations on 9/11 at the European Parliament and the Japanese Diet.
In his latest book, The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 911, the Cover -Up, and the Expose, Dr. Griffin once again invokes the tragic events of December 7, 1941, laying out further evidence for why he believes the attack of September 11, 2001 was an “inside job” — a false flag attack that can be traced to the highest levels of the US government.

In defense of his thesis, Griffin: –points out the continued failure of the mainstream press to investigate any of the questions and anomalies which appear to contradict the official account of 9/11, and claims the media dishonestly uses the term "conspiracy theory" to prevent criticism of the government’s conspiracy theory involving 19 “radical” Muslims.
–deconstructs, using expert testimony, the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s (NIST) five “crucial claims” about the World Trade Center (WCT) collapses, showing that NIST, in fact, provides no supporting evidence for any of its claims. He further points out that NIST and the 911 Commission ignored vast amounts of relevant evidence for controlled demolition of all three WTC buildings (WTC 1, 2, 7) that collapsed on 9/11, among which are the sudden, symmetrical collapses at near-freefall speeds (in the case of WTC7 into its own building footprint), pools of molten metal under the debris pile for weeks indicating temperatures considerably higher than jet-fuel and office-materials fires could possibly generate, and residue of explosives found in WTC dust.

–presents what he suspects to be motives that high level government officials had for orchestrating the 9/11 attacks. Griffin contends that the 9/11 Commission suppressed any mention of these possible motives, as well as the fact that key members of the Bush Administration were signatories to the radical plan drawn up in 2000 by the neo-conservative think tank, Project for the New American Century (PNAC), for increased militarization and global dominance. The PNAC report suggested the necessity for a “New Pearl Harbor” event to persuade the American public in favor of its stated goals, hence, the title of Griffin’s first and latest exposé, The New Pearl Harbor (Revisited).
Griffin’s 9/11 books have been endorsed by Michael Chossudovsky, William Sloane Coffin, Harvey Cox, Richard Falk, Catherine Austin Fitts, David Griscom, Jim Hightower, British MP Michael Meacher, Mark Crispin Miller, Rosemary Ruether, Marcus Raskin, Paul Craig Roberts, Peter Dale Scott, Gerry Spence, Lorie Van Auken, Howard Zinn, and former CIA officials Robert Baer, Bill Christison, and Ray McGovern.

Four of these books have been given special recognition: The New Pearl Harbor and The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortion received the 2006 Helios Foundation Award for 2006. Debunking 9/11 Debunking was a Bronze Medal Winner in the 2008 Independent Publisher Book Awards. The New Pearl Harbor Revisited was named a “Pick of the Week” in 2008 by Publishers Weekly.

His essays and interviews about 9/11 have appeared in such disparate publication as
1. Zion’s Herald,
2. Hustler Magazine,
3, Global Outlook
4. LA Times Magazine
5. Conversations in Religion and Theolog
6. Penthouse Netherlands
7. Whole Earth Times
8. Tikkun
9. Le Monde Diplomatique
10. Griffin has been featured on “The Richard & Judy Show” (London)
11. C-Span (twice),
12. ABC News Radio
13. “Tucker” on MSNBC
14, CBC (Canadian Broadcast Corporation)
15, the BBC’s “Heaven and Earth,”
16 and in over 400 radio talk-shows
17, including Democracy Now!
18. Many videos of his talks and interviews are available on the Internet

During the week prior to his lecture in Boston, Dr. Griffin will also give lectures in Wayne, PA, Vassar College, Portsmouth and Keene, NH.

[1] “9/11: A Christian Theologian’s Response: Deceptions of Empire and the Anti-Imperial Gospel of Jesus,” Zion’s Herald, July/August 2005: 5-6, 39-40
(available at http://www.anthonyflood.com/griffin911xntheologiansresponse.htm ).

[2] “What If Everything You Know about 9/11 Is Wrong?” Interview with Bruce David and Carolyn Sinclair, Hustler Magazine, August, 2005: 32-35, 108 (available at http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story 050604140153943 [text only] and http://911truth.org/docs/drgHfull.pdf (with graphics).

[3] “Truth and Politics of 9/11: Omissions and Distortions of The 9/11 Commission Report,” Global Outlook (www.GlobalOutlook.ca ), Issue 10 (Spring-Summer 2005), 45-56.

[4] “Getting Agnostic about 9/11” (an interview conducted by Mark Ehrman), LA Times Magazine, August 28, 2005 (http://www.latimes.com/features/printedition/magazine/la-tm-crgriffin35aug28,1,3835884.story?coll=la-headlines-magazine ).
[5] “Response to Ian Markham” (to Markham’s review of The New Pearl Harbor), Conversations in Religion and Theology, 3/2 (November, 2005): 220-236.

[6] “Rokende Pistolen Gezocht: De Echte Daders Achter 9/11” (Interview), Penthouse (Dutch), December, 2006: 088-091.

[7] “9/11 Under Attack: David Ray Griffin: Why the Official Story Just Doesn’t Make Sense.” Interview by Abigail Lewis. Whole Life Times, September 2006: 53-54.

[8] “The American Empire and 9/11,” Tikkun, March-April 2007) (http://www.tikkun.org/magazine/tik0703/frontpage/empire911 ).

[9] “The Truly Distracting 9/11 Conspiracy Theory: A Reply to Alexander Cockburn,” Le Monde Diplomatique Norway, English version, March 2007 (http://www.lmd.no/index.php?article08#fotnoter ).

[10] June 22, 2004.

[11] (1) “9/11 and the American Empire: How Should Religious People Respond?”, Lecture at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, April 18, 2005, broadcast on C-SPAN2 [BookTV], April 30, 2005 (available at http://www.911blogger.com/2005/04/proper-release-of-griffin-in-madison.html); BookTV, C-SPAN 2, November 24 & 25. (2) “9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out,” September 24, 2006, Berkeley, CA, edited by Peter Dale Scott and David Ray Griffin. The event featured remarks by Griffin, Scott, Peter Phillips, Kevin Ryan and Ray McGovern, who served as host.

[12] ABC News Radio, September 11, 2005.

[13] “Tucker,” MSNBC, August 9, 2005 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxKW3EqbfRE).

[14] “9/11: Truth, Lies and Conspiracy: Interview: David Ray Griffin,” CBC News, August 25, 2006 (http://www.cbc.ca/sunday/911griffin.html ).

[15] “Heaven and Earth,” BBC1, September 10, 2006 (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid81676883393469552 ).

[16] For some of these, see http://www.radiodujour.com/guests/griffin_david_ray/index.html .

[17] “The New Pearl Harbor: A Debate On A New Book That Alleges The Bush Administration Was Behind The 9/11 Attacks,” Democracy Now! May 26, 2004 (http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid/05/26/150221 ). Wednesday, May 26th.

[18] See http://video.google.com/videosearch?qid+ray+griffin&num&so=0&start0 .

[19] Independent Publishers (http://www.independentpublisher.com/article.php?page57&urltitle=Announcing%202007%20Independent%20Publisher%20Book%20Awards%20Results
http://www.independentpublisher.com/article.php?page57&urltitle=Announcing%202007%20Independent%20Publisher%20Book%20Awards%20Results )

Thursday, March 5, 2009

Political Leaders for 911 Truth

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

March 5, 2009

POLITICAL LEADERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH LAUNCHED TODAY

Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth (pl911truth.com) is today being launched as the latest formal group calling for a new investigation into the events of September 11, 2001. The organization is headed by Councilor (Senator) Yukihisa Fujita of Japan and former Senator Karen Johnson of Arizona.
This initiative is formed around a petition asking President Obama “to authorize a new, truly independent, investigation to determine what happened on 9/11.”
Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth thus joins other concerned citizens’ groups calling for a new investigation, including Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, Lawyers for 9/11 Truth, Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth, Pilots for 9/11 Truth, Religious Leaders for 9/11 Truth, Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice, and Veterans for 9/11 Truth.
Independent researchers from these professions have established beyond any reasonable doubt that the official account of 9/11 is false and that the official investigations have been cover-up operations.
Senator Yukihisa Fujita explains the new initiative: “Thus far there has been no response from political leaders in Washington or in other capitals around the world. Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth has been formed to encourage such a response.”
The organization is being launched with 20 charter members, including a former US governor, a former US senator, former US representatives, and former and present members of the British, German, Japanese, Norwegian, and European parliaments.
Charter member Robert Bowman, former head of the “Star Wars” program, explains the continuing relevance of the issue: “The 9/11 Tragedy has been used as the excuse for two deadly wars of aggression, for taking away our rights, and for committing war crimes that have undermined America’s reputation. Only by exposing the truth about 9/11 can we end this madness.”
Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth invites other people who hold, or have held, a political office---whether elected or appointed, whether municipal, state, provincial, national, or international--- to sign the petition at pl911truth.com.
Senator Johnson sums it up: “The organization believes that the truth about 9/11 needs to be exposed now---not in 50 years as a footnote in the history books---so the policies that have been based on the Bush-Cheney administration’s interpretation of the 9/11 attacks can be changed.”
Contact:
Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth
pl911truth.com



21 Political Leaders have already signed the petition


Berit Ås, former member of Parliament, Norway (Charter Member of PL911Truth)

Dr. Robert M. Bowman, former Director of Advanced Space Programs Development for the U.S. Air Force in the Ford and Carter administrations. (Charter Member of PL911Truth) Click here to see statement.

Carol Brouillet, Elected Santa Clara County Council Member (Green Party)

Andreas von Bülow, former State Secretary in the Federal Ministry of Defense, West Germany; former Minister of Research and Technology; former member of the German Parliament. (Charter Member of PL911Truth)

Giulietto Chiesa, Italian member of the European Parliament; vice chairman, Committee on International Trade; member, Committee on Security and Defense. (Charter Member of PL911Truth)

Wolfram Elsner, PhD, former head of the Planning Division of the Ministry of Economic Affairs of the State of Bremen and Director of the Bremen State Economic Research Institute, and Bremen State Official for Industrial Defense Conversion, 1989 - 2001. (Charter Member of PL911Truth)

Constance Fogal, Canadian Action Party Leader, 2004-2008. (Charter Member of PL911Truth)

Yukihisa Fujita, member of the House of Councilors, National Diet of Japan; Chairman, Special Committee on North Korean Abduction Issue and Related Matters; former member of the House of Representatives. (Charter Member of PL911Truth)

Senator Mike Gravel, former United States Senator, 1969 - 1981. (Charter Member of PL911Truth)

Dan Hamburg, former Californian member of the US House of Representatives; 1998 Green Party candidate for Governor of California. (Charter Member of PL911Truth)

Joel S. Hirschhorn, Senior Staff Member, Congressional Office of Technology Assessment 1978-1990. (Charter Member of PL911Truth) Click here to see statement.

Barbara Honegger, former White House Policy Analyst and Special Assistant to the Assistant to President Ronald Reagan (1981 - 1983). (Charter Member of PL911Truth)

Tadashi Inuzuka, member of the House of Councilors, National Diet of Japan. (Charter Member of PL911Truth)

Karen S. Johnson, former member of the Senate of the State of Arizona, where she was chair of the Family Services Committee. (Charter Member of PL911Truth)

Paul Lannoye, former Belgian member of the European Parliament, where he was vice chair of the Committee on Energy, Research, and Technology. (Charter Member of PL911Truth)

Cynthia McKinney, former Georgian member of the US House of Representatives, where she was a member of the Armed Services Committee and the International Relations Committee. (Charter Member of PL911Truth)

Michael Meacher, Minister of the British Parliament; former Minister of the Environment; former Undersecretary for Industry. (Charter Member of PL911Truth)

Dr. Andrew J. Moulden, Leader of the Canadian Action Party. (Charter Member of PL911Truth)

Val Scott, founding member of Canada's New Democratic Party; former Trustee and Vice Chairman of North York Board of Education, Ontario, Canada. (Charter Member of PL911Truth) Click here to see statement.

Gianni Vattimo, Member of European Parliament, 1999 - 2004 (Italy). Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs. Committee on Employment and Social Affairs. Committee on Culture, Youth, Education, the Media and Sport. (Charter Member of PL911Truth)

Jesse Ventura, former Governor of Minnesota. (Charter Member of PL911Truth)

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

NEWS FLASH! April Gallup interview..She was inside the Pentagon on 911 and saw no evidence of an airplane..it was an explosion iinside the building.



April Gallup 911 Pentagon Survivor on alex Jones TV : No Plane Part One



April Gallup Was there a bomb in the Pentagon #2



alexJones April Gallup #3



Aprol Gallup #4




Press Release Mon., Dec. 15, 2008
New York City, New York

A lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Manhattan Monday charges Vice President Dick Cheney, former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld,and ex-Air Force General Richard Myers, acting Chairman of the Joint Chiefson September 11th with “broad complicity” in the attacks of that horrific day. The suit seeks damages, triple damages and punitive damages for an ex-U.S.Army member who, along with her two-month-old baby, was injured in the terrorist attack on the Pentagon on 9/11.

The ex-G.I. plaintiff alleges she has been denied government support since then, because she raised “painful questions” about the inexplicable failure of military defenses at the Pentagon that day, and especially the failure of officials to warn and evacuate the occupants of the building when they knew the attack was imminent.

The complaint alleges the three leaders and other “unknown, named” U.S. military and civilian officials engaged in a conspiracy to “facilitate and enable” the Attack on America; because they wished to bring about a “frightening catastrophe of terrorism”, “a new Pearl Harbor”, which would create “a powerful reaction of fear and anger in the public and in Washington”. This would generate an “atmosphere of acceptance” which would allow the longed-for neo-conservative political and military program to go forward: invade Afghanistan, pass the Patriot Act, invade Iraq, tap phones, etc; torture, lie, intimidate, etc.

The plaintiff AG [April Gallop] was a career soldier, holding top secret clearance, who had an agreeable assignment in Germany until she was abruptly transferred to the Pentagon in 2000. On September 11, 2001, she had a new baby boy, Elisha, with her on her first day back from a two-month maternity leave. She was told by her supervisor to hurry to her desk that morning, for an urgent document-clearing job, and to drop the baby off at child care later. She got to her office, turned on her computer, and the place blew up. There were at least two big explosions that she heard and felt.

The walls collapsed, the ceiling fell in, she was hit in the head and knocked unconscious; she came to, grabbed the baby (who was also hit in the head), and picked her way out to where daylight was showing, wherethe front of the first floor had been blown off. The insides of the building were also blown out; but there was no sign of any wrecked airliner, and no burning jet fuel splashed anywhere.

There is also no sign of airliner wreckage in any photograph that has been published so far; and there are many photographs that show a clear absence of wreckage, and plain evidence of blast damage. Many internet sites carry the pictures. See, e.g,

http://www.teamlaw.org/images/Penthitista.jpg?sdgsdf ;

http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pentagon/docs/metcalf3.jpg

Meanwhile, there are said to be some 85 videotapes from various surveillance cameras on and around the Pentagon, which the U.S. Department of Justice is withholding from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. What do they show, or not show?

The Pentagon has released two video clips from cameras showing the side of the Pentagon that was hit. In the first, at about 1:07, just after a car passes in front, a white or silver projectile-shaped object appears at the right edge of the picture, opposite the building; and the next frames show an explosion beginning at the front of the building, followed by a fireball. The object is indistinct, and definitely not recognizable as an airliner.

In the second tape, from a camera a little further away but with the same general view, you see the car pass, and then at 25 seconds, a plume of white smoke shows on the right side, where the shape was in the first tape. A parking lot entry ticket device in the foreground hides the object emitting the smoke, and the explosion begins in the next frame; but plainly there is no giant airliner hidden behind the parking device, about to strike the building. Both tapes, obtained by Judicial Watch in 2006 are at: http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,97499,00.html

The official report suggests the plane disintegrated on impact, but also that parts of it plowed all the way through to the back wall of the “C-ring”, some 300 feet from where it hit on the outside; but there are no pictures of airplane wreckage inside the building either.

See http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pentagon/docs/punchout_rv.jpg ; http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pentagon/docs/interior_damage1.jpg

see also http://rawstory.com/news/2008/911_survivor_blasts_Rumsfeld_Cheney_No_1217.html

The plaintiff alleges her belief that no airliner crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11, although it appears that one swooped low over the building just when bombs went off inside, or a missile hit, or both. These may have been controlled from E-4B, the Air Force “doomsday plane” which was shown live on CNN, circling over Washington at the time of the attack.

But whether a plane hit the building or something else did, certainly there was no warning of a plane's approach; which might have saved the plaintiff and her child, many others who were hurt, and the 125 people, members of the military and civilian employees, who died in the attack that morning. Yet flight controllers broadcast an emergency warning about the plane more than a half-four before the Pentagon was hit.

The explosion(s) destroyed the interior of the building where plaintiff’s office was. When she could gather herself from the blast, with help from other survivors, they made their way out through rubble, smoke and dust. She got to the outside, holding her baby, collapsed on the grass, and woke up later inthe hospital.

Officials came to the hospital and asked her what she thought happened. She told them a bomb went off; but they said no, in fact, an airplane crashed into the building. She asked, and has continued to ask: where were the fighter planes, that have protected America's skies for so long; that normally go up once or twice a week, at a moment’s notice, to check on off-course airliners? Where were the Pentagon's defenses? Where was the alarm, to get the people out of harm's way?

These are painful questions, indeed, and Rumsfeld and Cheney have not given good or even decent answers. Their multiple stories, especially as embodied in the duplicitous Report of the Official 9/11 Commission, controlled by Bush Administration insider Phillip Zelikow, do not hold water and can be proven false. The Report is full of errors, omissions and distortions, and has been thoroughly discredited, in the writings of David Ray Griffin and numerous others.

AG went to a special Commission hearing in 2004, open only to survivors, and watched as Donald Rumsfeld gave rambling, evasive answers about the failure of the Pentagon defenses, particularly the fighter planes. The Commissioners failed to confront his non-responsiveness, and never pinned him down. Cheney was observed in the White House bunker that morning by Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta, apparently giving orders that the plane headed towards Washington be allowed to continue. Cheney has never testified or been reasonably questioned about his actions.

We brought this lawsuit for AG and her son to hold them to account...

Monday, December 15, 2008

Richard Grove, Premier whistlblower

Richard Grove, 911 Whistleblower Extraordinaire


We Are Change interviews Richard Grove (part 1 of 3) By Richard Grove
View in HD  Download 540p Version  Visit Richard Grove's ExposureRoom Videos Page


We are change Part One


We Are Change interviews Richard Grove (part 2 of 3) By Richard Grove
View in HD  Download 540p Version  Visit Richard Grove's ExposureRoom Videos Page


Part Two


We Are Change interviews Richard Grove (part 1 of 3) By Richard Grove
View in HD  Download 540p Version  Visit Richard Grove's ExposureRoom Videos Page


Part Three

Richard Gage returns from a very succesful European tour

Final Report on the European Tour -- A Great Success!

by Richard Gage, AIA

It looks like the Europe Tour was an awesome success!
Thousands of Europeans were exposed to the truth about
the explosive controlled demolitions of the 3 World Trade Center high-rises on 9/11 — in 9 cities, across 6 countries, including London, Madrid, Vienna, Geneva, Paris, Aachen, Brussels,Hamburg, and Berlin.
Hundreds of architects & engineers came to see what all the controversy was about. (See the numbers in the individual event records). Mainstream media in Spain gave us a good TV interview and prime time coverage of the AE911Truth presentation. About 8 other radio and TV interviews provided additional coverage. Full houses in Madrid and Paris caused people to be turned away. I gave some of the better presentations I've ever given and received a standing ovation.
Language was not an issue because we had translators where it was most necessary. And the numbers of hands raised revealed that hardly anyone supported the official conspiracy and fire story after the evidence was given. The event coordinators in every one of the 9 cities showed up and performed professionally from start to finish – working around the clock to ensure=2 0that publicity via the TV & news media, marketing to A&E's, and even leafleting on the street, as well as all the facility
coordination went without a hitch! These guys are incredible and give the Americans an edge to strive for!

A huge thank you to Ms. Annie Machon from London, whose tireless efforts and seamless skills went toward putting the tour together, and who coordinated all of the European Coordinator activities to ensure my efficient travel and other details. And to the lead EC's themselves: Gareth and Douglass in London; Diana and Greg in Madrid; Daniel T. and Jimmy W. in Vienna; Richard Golay, Florian and Valerie in Geneva; Arno, and Deborah in Paris; Channing in Aachen; Jean-Luc and Eric in Brussels; Jens and Inez in Hamburg; Ronald, Oliver, Heiner, Hauke, Sebastian, and Clifford in Berlin. You and your team are all national and world patriots, and heroes!

I was treated in every city to an incredible whirlwind tour by our gracious EC's. At the top of my list, though, had to be the harrowing motorcycle ride through the medieval streets of Paris – and the Avenue Champs-Élysées – after which Arno brought to life the Eiffel tower, Notre Dame, the Arc de Triomphe, Sacré-Cœur Basilica, and other famous treats to the eye. A close tie had to be the modern domed architectural
masterpiece of Sir Norman Foster at the top of the historic Reichstag in Berlin, and Charlemagne's ma gnificent cathedral in Aachen. And don't miss the "Gherkin" — a pickled shape20building in London, also designed by Sir Norman Foster with an amazing cross-spiraling perimeter structure. (see photos in the galleries below)

Don't wait to go to Europe until you're 53! You'll regret having missed so much of the unique people and architecture. They are indeed quite aware of and sensitive to the growing political/social/military machine in America. We really don't see it because we live in it and haven't been given an outside view of it through our media. It seems
that almost everyone in Europe disfavors the outgoing American Administration – and with a passion! And that is even without hearing the evidence in our 9/11 presentation and its obvious implications.
There is quite a move in the European community to bring David Ray Griffin over this spring. Willie Rodriquez recently completed a short powerful tour. And they seem to want AE911Truth back in 6 months. The truth and the truth-tellers are relentless in Europe. We will support them wholeheartedly. It seems that it will require massive
international pressure upon our American Government in order to compel necessary self-reflection and moral will-power of our elected representatives to engage the weighty issues of 9/11 head on, raise truth and justice upon their shoulders, and let the chips fall where they may. My sense is that all of Europe will come to the aid of an ailing America, as we have to them in their times of peril. It has been an20immense honor for AE911Truth to be one small voice in the sea of American cries for help from20our friends across theAtlantic.
I am so grateful for an enlightening and enriching trip where deep friendships and alliances have been forged. Let's build on the momentum!

— Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

http://www.ae911truth.org/events/eurotour/